Atheism seems to me to be a bit schizophrenic. While recognizing no god but themselves, they demand the inalienable rights described by our founding fathers as being given by God. If they have given these rights to themselves apart from God, where is their moral framework to exercise these rights? If there is no moral framework, then the rights of an atheist are determined by the strongest and are not inalienable. In an atheist society, one must be king and the rest subjects.
---William Fortner 2009---